‘Islamic’ finance. Will it ever take off?

The current landscape of financial products can be overwhelming.  In today’s digitised, globalised economy, the ‘wealth’ (for want of a better word) of vocabulary alone is astonishing: ISAs; pensions; instant access savings; 120-day notice withdrawal accounts; relevant life cover; drawdown; flexible benefits…the list goes on.

Throw into this pool the antiquated terminology of an ancient language such as Arabic, as Islamic financial products currently do: Sukuk; Musharaka; takaful, and you might want to hold on to a life jacket to prevent yourself from drowning.

The challenge is to create and promote equitable and fairly priced services and products to the entire community and not simply a segment of it. To not do this, the Islamic finance industry risks creating a fledgeling parallel economy with further segregated communities no matter the strength of its intellectual and supposedly moral foundation. No doubt, dropping classical Arabic centric labels will go some way in fomenting positive inquiry from all sections of the society. But, it’s more than dealing with the Arabic lexicon.

London is the largest Islamic finance centre outside of the Muslim World, and it is only due  to the UK’s need and want to attract wealthy middle eastern private, institutional and sovereign investments.

It is, however, questionable whether there is a profitable domestic market for products targeted solely to Muslims.  Consider the fact that only 20% of Muslims are economically active in comparison to the national average of 35%,  and the fact that a whopping 46% reside in some  of the most deprived areas in England it’s highly unlikely such a demographic is likely to be able to invest any surplus wealth if they even have any or whether much of that market can afford the higher monthly payments associated with ‘shariah’ compliant home purchase plans.

Add to these facts that not all those who identify as Muslims are practising, and even if they are, they raise legitimate criticisms about just how ‘islamic’ the mortgage equivalent offered by the Islamic finance industry actually is, simply because it looks like a more expensive form of an interest-based product with conventional terms substituted for Arabic ones that give the illusion of religious legitimacy.

In such a context, can Islamic finance move away from being on the periphery where it currently is?

I do not believe ‘Islamic’ finance be it to do with mortgages or investments should be targeted to a single religious and cultural demographic and nor do I believe ‘Islamic’ finance should be modelled to fit within a corporate economic landscape that is not based on faith-based values, but rather profit, profit, profit at the institutions lowest marginal risk.

Islamic finance has not been able to take off as originally anticipated because of the four reasons that I’ve alluded to, but to surmise:

  1. The Language – unnecessary use of a foreign language that even Muslims get confused with and professionals need to take additional training to simply be able to adequately advise on them
  2. The Marketing – Targeting only a Muslim customer base
  3. The Market – Targeting a demography that simply cannot afford to invest, or cannot afford the higher finance payments
  4. The Product – When it comes to home finance, it simply doesn’t feel faith-based nor does it feel different to a conventional mortgage.

The Islamic economic model is based on the concept of sharing both risk and reward. In the context of home buying, it should be simple, the entity with the cash helps the person without the cash to buy a home, in return for which the person who occupies the property pays the financier who is not residing in the property a proportionate rent. The person residing (the co-owner) in the property has the option to purchase additional shares as and when he or she can afford to do so, thereby reducing their rental payments. The financier can sell shares at market price or for the sake of its own liquidity can choose to sell those shares at discount to attract their co-owners to make additional acquisition payments.

This is not what happens with today’s home purchase plans, first of all, despite such plans being referred to as partnerships, it doesn’t feel like a partnership as the risk remains on the co-owner residing in the property as they have to bear the costs of the building insurance, and they also have to repay the financiers portion in the event of a sale at below the level of the outstanding finance.

Then there’s the issue of the rental payment made to the financier, it’s not based on market rent but rather benchmarked against the bank base rate. This is done to keep the cost of the finance the same for all regardless of where you may be in the country, and on the face of it, it looks reasonable, but is it?

The average rent for a 3-bedroom property in Nottingham is £840 per month, the average price of such a property is £200,000.

If you were to take out a fixed 80% Al Rayan FTV (Finance to Value) product on such a property you’d have £160,000 on finance for which you’d pay £800.14 per month in monthly ‘rent’ over a 25-year period.

Now, if the same property was financed on a true partnership-based model, the co-owner would only pay 80% of the market rent, which would be only £672.

The surplus monies could be used to buy further shares in the property. When the property is sold, the financier benefits proportionately from the equity growth too, as they should as true partners, unlike what happens with the current ‘diminishing musharaka’ contract.

Of course, ‘diminishing musharaka’ could quite easily have been called ‘diminishing partnership’ but as things stand it doesn’t feel like there’s any more of a partnership than what one would have with the Halifax.

So, what next for Islamic finance? Maybe that’s not the question we should be asking but rather what’s needed for a just economy that looks at market opportunities not for the sake of profit but for the sake of solving a problem. Blessings would no doubt follow for all, says the theist.

 

Mohammad Uz-Zaman is the Director of ADL Estate Planning Ltd and ADL Wealth Ltd. He is a private client wealth manager who holds accreditations across regulated financial advice and estate planning. He holds a BSc (Hons) in Psychology & Sociology and an MA in Islamic Studies in addition to various professional qualifications.

61% of invoices go beyond the debtor day period. How do you combat this in your business?

 

A recent survey has found that two thirds of medium enterprise business owners have experienced problems with cash flow due to a lack of working capital in the last two years, thanks to invoices not being paid within their debtor period. The survey of 500 UK business owners revealed that 61% of invoices issued by SMEs remained unpaid within the debtor day period.

Alarmingly, 16% of those invoices were still unpaid after 90 days, with 7% still not paid after six months.

Of the businesses surveyed, 70% stated that they depend on being paid promptly in order to avoid becoming strained by a shortage of working capital. What businesses struggled with the most due to limited cash flow was paying suppliers, with over two in five (41%) of respondents citing this as an issue. Of the other common issues caused by cash flow shortages, 30% said they failed to meet debt repayments, 29% were unable to purchase inventory, nearly a quarter (24%) said they had struggled to pay staff and 18% had missed out on contracts.

The emotional impact of invoice non-payment was also revealed, with 28% of respondents stating that they had been caused considerable stress and anxiety by cash flow problems, with 19% admitting that their frustration had led to anger and 10% experiencing fears that their business would go bust.

“Our research shows that most small firms recognise the damage caused by cashflow problems”, says a statement from the financial experts who conducted the survey, “but that doesn’t guarantee their immunity. The worst case scenario is insolvency but in our experience, slow paying invoices are often to blame. As working capital and cashflow are by their very nature dynamic, most traditional systems have failed to keep pace over the last few years”.

Whilst chasing the debts of your company might not be your favourite way to spend time, ensuring that as many of your invoices as possible are paid promptly will ensure you avoid both the financial and emotional strain outstanding debts can clearly cause. Having a robust and efficient system of collecting debts will ensure that any outstanding debts are handled, as well as creating strong relationships with suppliers, customers and contractors so that invoices are rarely left outstanding in the first place.

Adorable animals playing in the snow!

http://news-view.co.uk/adorable-animals-playing-snow/

The value of mortgage advice

Mortgage advice might not be for everyone, but for those clients who seek it out it can be an invaluable service in helping them to strike a better deal than they could have achieved on their own. The role of a mortgage adviser is to work with a buyer in order to find them the best option for their circumstances.

The main way in which a mortgage adviser achieves this is by helping a buyer through the mortgage application process. This includes researching the various mortgage options available to the buyer, as well as offering guidance and expertise on mortgage protection, repayments, refinancing and building insurance. Be aware of potential bias within this, however: a mortgage adviser working for a bank will only offer advice on the services provided by the bank; whereas an independent adviser, or one working for an estate agent, is likely to advise on a wider selection of services and companies.

If you’re seeking out a mortgage adviser, there are a few key factors to keep in mind. Anyone giving professional mortgage advice is required by the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) to have reached a certain level of expertise. It’s therefore necessary for any mortgage adviser to have studied for either a Certificate in Mortgage Advice from the Chartered Insurance Institute (CII) or a Certificate in Mortgage Advice and Practice (CeMAP) from the ifs School of Finance (soon to be renamed The London Institute of Banking and Finance). Whether you find them through your bank or through another route, make sure any mortgage adviser whose services you use has at least one of these qualifications.

If you already pay for the services of a financial adviser, it’s worth investigating whether they can also provide mortgage advice. One route to becoming a financial adviser is to qualify as a specialist mortgage adviser and then complete further training. If your financial adviser has taken this route into their profession, not only will using them as your mortgage adviser save you money, but as they are already aware of your financial situation, it will also save you the time and effort of explaining this to a separate mortgage adviser.

Lastly, remember that any advice you receive is just that. Whatever your mortgage adviser, whoever they might be, advises you to do, there’s no obligation on your part until you’ve signed any official documentation. It’s important not to feel pressured or to simply go along with any advice you’re given. A mortgage is a major financial commitment, so don’t agree to anything until you feel completely happy with any arrangement your adviser provides.